Quote:
There are a lot of blacks on our side than yours. You have a lot of white supremacists on your side.

Former KKK Wizard David Duke clearly understands Heston's "cultural war". He praised Heston's speech: "I am thankful to hear a man with such high esteem say essentially the same things for which I have been reviled."

"If you register your gun with anybody, you're a nut! When the conspiracy comes for your firearm, give it to 'em like this grand dragon is going to - right between the eyes."
-Klu Klux Klan (Richmond Times- Dispatch, July 5, 1967)

And who could be more ignorant than the missing link?


You know what Brady, based on your quotes it sounds like the black community doesn't want equality, they're actually happy being second class citizens without rights or freedoms, because then they've got something to hang over the heads of the white community and complain about all the time, rather than looking at themselves and seeing their own faults.

The NRA doesn't support white supremacy, the blacks apparently do. The black community is going along with these liberal ideas about disarmerment, even though most of such ideas first targeted them as the "black laws" of the southern states.

Sounds to me like the black community wants to be helpless, wants to be vulnerable, forced to rely on the police and flock to their preachers for prayer vigels whenever something goes wrong. Sounds like they're in support of the scheme of the KKK to keep them subserveant and "in their place where they belong". Sounds like they don't want freedom or rights.

Quote:
So if you don't have a gun to protect yourself because of gun control laws then it's your fault not the government's.


It's the fault of the government, specifically the lower state government, if they make laws that prohibit you from obtaining a firearm when you need it.

Quote:
The government isn't under any general duty to protect you so they can pass all the gun control laws they want according to your quote.


Wrong again Brady! The government is forbidden from banning access of the individuals to firearms. They can't just pass whatever law they want to take away guns, it doesn't work like that.

And if they did pass such laws anyway they'd be saying "Not only are we not in charge of taking care of you, we won't allow you to take care of yourself", and that'd start a revolution; potentially a violent one.

Quote:
No, but when someone is homicidal, and they have a gun, they are more likely to be successful than someone with a knife. It all depends on the situation, in the home with domestic abuse it is a lot easier with a knife, but out on the streets it is much harder.


Not necessarily.

Quote:
Which asks the question of why a person needs a license to drive a car, but not to have a gun. I know the constitutional issues are a little bit difficult on this issue, and that an individual in theory should be able to get a gun without being licenses, but if the license was not prohibitive, ie, a person only had to pass a simple course that taught safty etc, then it should not be a problem.


Like you said, you can't license a right.
"the fundamental principle that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any particular individual citizen." Warren vs. The District of Columbia.