Quote:
According to my friends in Britain, my perceived version of your government is the true version when compared to your own.


Well, your statement says it all really

"According to my friends in Britain"
Ie, second hand information with who knows what bias, retold by someone with no experience whatsoever. I cannot talk with these so called british people to challenge what they are saying, so they could be like a lot of british people and talking out of their ********.
Your "perceived version" is just that, perceived. YOu cannot make a decent argument, you always add on extra things that have nothing to do with anything and take away the important stuff so you are left with what looks like a 2 year old's painting.

So, a second hand version, with who knows what bias, with no experience, is better than someone who grew up in the country, has lived under different parties and governments, who has been a member of one of those parties.

But then when i talk about america, i have no idea, because i only have first hand experience, when second hand experience would be so much better. (though i have that as well), i have even lived under presidents of both parties in the US.

You must be right, because you are american.

Quote:
Well subjects don't have rights, they have privelages.


ANd you claim that i dont know what "rights" are. YOu dont even know the theory.

Quote:
The states of Alaska and Vermont.


Do they? Or do they just feel no need for licensing. Prove to me where these states say that it would be unconstitutional for them to have carry and conceal licenses.

Quote:
Basically it's just like what's going on with your government; just because they instituted the policies they have doesn't mean that they were allowed to do so.


What do you mean "allowed to", is this like some primary school??? This is power play, people attempting to have more power than anyone else so they can make themselves rich.