Quote:
All "rights" have scope, and the 2A especially protects only a small amount of what you do with your gun.


Regardless of that fact, it's not for YOU to decide. What the hell do you know about rights in the first place? You said you don't believe in them, and you never had any to begin with.

Your government didn't trust you people enough to recognize their rights to they gave them a Bill of Privelages to appease them, and then they took it away.

That brings me to another subject. Apparently Britain has decided to give medical fish a Bill of Rights. The very notion that they can "give" a list of what rights are to fish shows just how conceded they are.

Quote:
So in 2000 BC all humans were having their "right" infringed upon because guns did not actually exist!!!


Arms you bastard, not guns! A-R-M-S! All arms are not guns, arms applies to more than just handguns and rifles and shotguns and machineguns!

Quote:
We know why there is a RKBA, we can see through the development of history why it exists, so to suggest that it is something fundamental of humanity itself is more of a joke than anything else.


Again, someone without rights, in a different country, thinking he knows our country better than we do.

Quote:
Religion has been around a lot longer than firearms.


And weapons have been around longer than humans, religion and violence. Sticks and rocks existed before humans appered on Earth.

Quote:
More, you are infringing upon this person's "rights", because quite frankly, there are probably 5 million americans who cannot keep or bear arms because the US govt says they cant.


What're you trying to get at with this crap again? Criminals don't have rights because they gave them up by deciding to violate the rights of others.

Quote:
So what does this say about your govt then? There are gun bans in the US.


It says our government has overstepped its boundaries and that it's time for it to be beat back, either bit by bit or all at once.
"the fundamental principle that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any particular individual citizen." Warren vs. The District of Columbia.