Quote:
Exactly. They know that if they weren't armed then more people like me would be more willing to beat the living crap out of them. Ergo the criminals are scared of actually comitting a violent crime when they have nothing to back up their threats, because there ARE people like me who would take the opportunity and fight back and most likely win.


Take me for example, I'm 6 feet tall weight 230 pounds, am in pretty good shape. If you saw the channel 7 news brief I placed out, you can tell I'm no small guy.

Now If I'm going to go rob someone, and I see someone who is female walking down the street that is 120 pounds soaking wet, I'm still going to want a gun, to rob that person. Even if I didn't have a gun, a small baseball bat will be enough. Or just a knife, or even my hands.

Now what is that person going to do when I come for her. Defenderofliberty, Galleliao1663, and you too OMDP, are thinking yeah we have lessened the number of guns (by making it harder for law-abiding citizens to have access to guns by closing nearby gun stores) on the street, but now what about the lady who is walking down the street. What is she going to do ?

Quote:
A fact of life, get it through your heads anti-gunners. You're wrong, you've always will be wrong, and you'll continue to be wrong until the day you die, or forever renounce your anti-gun ways and admit publicly that you were WRONG and will never try such a stance again!


Yeah, but them if they did that this board would close down and not be so interesting. Well many of them have been on the board and more than most people have thought about this issue more than the average citizen. They know the real truth, they know that if it was their loved ones on the street they aren't going to want to see them in a disarming state in a dangerous area.

I just say bring some better arguments. :evil

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

To be honest about this issue that is very disturbing is that most of the people that want gun control seem to be black or white liberals. That is very disturbing to me because historically, which racial group has ever had law made up to deny their rights for firearms. It was blacks. Yes, Italians, Irish, and many immigrants have had laws attempting to deny them firearms but those laws never named them as a a group of people directly. Blacks have that distinction.

So why for the life of me would blacks even want gun control laws. But when you look at media, not necessarily blaming them either, all you see are blacks being the victim of gun violence or the perpetrators of it; and this lays the basis for people wanting less guns, even though as a group of peoples guns were used to ward off terrorist groups like the KKK, especially when the government was no where to be found.

Also another thing that is very disturbing to me about anti-gun groups isn't that they are anti-gun. But anti-self-defense. If you look at any website that is anti-gun. The www.bradycampaign.org/ or www.rainbowpush.org/ or www.aclu.org/ or www.iansa.org/
or Illinois council on Handgun Violence

Here on you tube this debate between NRA and IANSA has Rebecca Peterson never mentioned unarmed self-defense.

NRA: Great UN Gun Debate (Part 1)
NRA: Great UN Gun Debate (Part 2)
NRA:Great UN Gun Debate (Part 3)
NRA:Great UN Gun Debate (Part 4)

I will tell you that if you do not mention it, your not supporting it.

None of them talk about self-defense without guns. No replacement is someone wanted to defend themselves without guns. They don't even talk about it. To them negotiation or submission seem to be their way of defending yourself. When someone is raped, they ask did the person use a gun. If not, I doubt they are interested.

Wouldn't you think anti-gun groups would be at the forefront of unarmed self-defense. I think it would make their stance more creditable. But since they don't talk about it mention it, you can only assume either that they desire victimization and submission or are working for the criminals.

Has Galleliao1663, OMDP, or Defenderofliberty ever talked about unarmed self-defense in any way as a method or replacement for the lack of gun ownership ? I have never heard them say anything on the matter.

Especially in Britain, it should be more important, because gun are already outlawed and it is very unlikely that conceal carry is going to be there any time soon. Shoot if Britain and other gun control countries love their laws they should be at the forefront of promoting unarmed self-defense.


That which does not kill you, makes you stronger.