Quote:
You NEVER use the militia argument when it comes to the Second Amendment, EVER!


I do.

Quote:
The courts have interpreted the militia to mean the National Guard.


Have they? The supreme court has not, precedent is set first by them. Secondly there is a law present which disproves this.

Quote:
And the general populace has the stereotype image of the militia being a bunch of white redneck and racist guys dressed in as soldiers or in denim who plan nothing but overthrowing the government, like they're a terrorist organization bent on world domination.


So?? Apparently though americans know what they are talking about this, well that is your argument isnt it, i know nothing because i am british and you know everything because you are american, turns out americans dont automatically know it all.

Quote:
It was introduced to protect our right to have guns as we please, nothing else!


If this were the case then the second amendment part of this board would not have my name as the last person to write on the last six topics.
PROVE what you are saying. I have plenty of times, shown that what you have said is wrong.

Quote:
The whole reason the Second Amendment came about is because your acestors decided to disarm mine by overwhelming force.


Yeah, and they attempted to take the freedom away and install bad government, so the 2A was designed to protect THAT, not hunting, ping pong, sweets or anything else.